Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F265D1A4 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45145 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2012 12:13:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 44931 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2012 12:13:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 44903 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2012 12:13:40 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:13:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [192.168.1.5]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username rnewson, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:13:40 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Subject: Re: couchdb returning truncated JSON From: Robert Newson In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:13:37 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: user@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) A full view response should always be valid JSON, so that does point = towards a bug in CouchDB assuming the response output you posted is = verbatim what CouchDB returned. Can you reproduce this reliably? Oh, and unrelated to the bug itself, but R14A is a beta release, you = should upgrade. B. On 19 Aug 2012, at 11:05, CGS wrote: > I don't suppose the problem is coming from CouchDB, but from your = external > environment which has a limited number of characters per line, = truncating > the message if more. It happened to me in few occasions (Linux = terminal > truncated my message because it was single line - line end was = translated > as "\n" inside the message, so, no real line break was actually = registered). >=20 > CGS >=20 >=20 > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Tim Tisdall = wrote: >=20 >> I have a script where I query a view for multiple entries of data. >> I'm doing it in batches of 1000. It works fine multiple times and >> then suddenly it returns a result that doesn't properly parse as JSON >> because it's missing some content at the end (not sure how much, but >> it's at least missing the final bracket to make it complete). >>=20 >> My logs don't point out any problem... >>=20 >> [Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:14:08 GMT] [debug] [<0.26768.3>] 'POST' >> /app_stats/_design/processing/_view/blanks {1,0} from "127.0.0.1" >> Headers: [{'Content-Length',"14010"}, >> {'Content-Type',"application/json"}, >> {'Host',"localhost"}] >> [Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:14:08 GMT] [debug] [<0.26768.3>] OAuth Params: = [] >> [Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:14:08 GMT] [debug] [<0.26768.3>] request_group >> {Pid, Seq} {<0.20450.3>,95240673} >> [Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:14:08 GMT] [info] [<0.26768.3>] 127.0.0.1 - - >> POST /app_stats/_design/processing/_view/blanks 200 >>=20 >> Here's what I received from couchdb: >>=20 >> HTTP/1.0 200 OK >> Server: CouchDB/1.2.0 (Erlang OTP/R14A) >> ETag: "B25M1ITCCF4RKMFE87QMQ1N3M" >> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:22:10 GMT >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8 >> Cache-Control: must-revalidate >>=20 >> {"total_rows":14829491,"offset":12357523,"rows":[ >>=20 >> = {"id":"34049664743","key":"34049664743","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]}, >>=20 >> = {"id":"34049674790","key":"34049674790","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]}, >>=20 >> = {"id":"34049683784","key":"34049683784","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]}, >>=20 >> = {"id":"34049710675","key":"34049710675","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]}, >> [ ** SNIP ** ] >>=20 >> = {"id":"34082476762","key":"34082476762","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]}, >>=20 >> = {"id":"34082494494","key":"34082494494","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]}, >>=20 >> = {"id":"34082507402","key":"34082507402","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]}, >>=20 >> = {"id":"34082533553","key":"34082533553","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]}, >>=20 >> = {"id":"34082612840","key":"34082612840","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]}, >>=20 >> = {"id":"34082621527","key":"34082621527","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]}, >>=20 >> = {"id":"34082680993","key":"34082680993","value":[{"start_date":"2012-08-05= ","end_date":null}]} >>=20 >> it seems to consistently truncate at a point where the next character >> should either be another comma or a closing square bracket (to close >> the "rows" array). >>=20 >> I tried changing the script to do batches of 100 and it seems to be >> running without problems. Shouldn't there be some sort of error, >> though? >>=20