Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D755DFCF for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5723 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2012 21:45:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 5684 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2012 21:45:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 5676 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2012 21:45:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:45:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.52] (HELO mail-vb0-f52.google.com) (209.85.212.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:45:00 +0000 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23so2681526vbz.11 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:44:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ztORRhAiiSxNbqHcif5Tm0e3LeB3SV9S4hKRLoL9o3A=; b=i34fPtJkb5vNZa9DWRPLZgrsEhCeApQWI6Qa4N9G2uXCz6k1qOAFWmOZyjARCq3NLb a9WE/4fxlIPQ46b3Rkp9rhA0lSADmM10r0L0Z2PHewGrUDbdi2V/xO3gl+u1rWUoQPTj Er0FzD8GlwNiot9BoWvjRiS41nDkTjJ3HwoKLKd8h89njm/vlgy94tzMJ6A5/Dj4CR1v OiN9081f+xxzXcYPrqxN6MwTnJoUFsJ7C4GR3YZ9H8iOQcujFcvVaG0Q0r3nATT3zx0d jeJ3/8WxvNtttkY1HY2cIEZ6D7paH3O9hmp1IwOSca9noDQl1PxIx51UP4blquZ0ggez iLRA== Received: by 10.52.93.194 with SMTP id cw2mr2161746vdb.9.1342734278500; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:44:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.186.163 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:44:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [68.5.117.177] In-Reply-To: References: From: Mark Hahn Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:44:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Atomicity with _update handlers? To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071c644b2a2d604c535af8b X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnLZnGYFgeoZH2v2T1JIq+mLMG/4oi3iJzLNmQubU2tqx/y2Eg/EeJmmx/rfrFHHs2XNlkf --20cf3071c644b2a2d604c535af8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > what sort of atomicity guarantees exist for _update handlers. None. And they can fail with a 409 revision conflict --20cf3071c644b2a2d604c535af8b--