incubator-couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Newson <rnew...@apache.org>
Subject Re: different output from 1.1 and 1.2
Date Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:26:44 GMT

Both forms are valid Unicode (in UTF-8 encoding). The character in question can be represented
directly or as a unicode escape sequence. Both answers are correct and equivalent.

B.

On 3 Jul 2012, at 16:16, Marten Feldtmann wrote:

> From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt:
> 
> "
> ...
> JSON text SHALL be encoded in Unicode.  The default encoding is
>   UTF-8.
> ...
> "
> 
> The JSON parser (used) should therefore deliver the same object structure ... regardless
of the escaped-format-writing or not.
> 
> Marten
> 
> 
> Am 03.07.2012 15:57, schrieb Thomas.Bock@ptb.de:
>> I'm not quite sure (in the sense that I don't understand)
>> about the word equivalent;
>> but thank you very much so far!


Mime
View raw message