Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A62CC98B for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 09:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86791 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2012 09:47:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 86230 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2012 09:47:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 86202 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2012 09:47:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 09:47:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mkimber@kana.com designates 64.95.72.244 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.95.72.244] (HELO mxout.myoutlookonline.com) (64.95.72.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 09:47:09 +0000 Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330D2843E3D for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 05:29:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan Received: from HUB016.mail.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4258843B91 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 05:29:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from BE259.mail.lan ([10.110.32.159]) by HUB016.mail.lan ([10.110.17.16]) with mapi; Thu, 24 May 2012 05:46:38 -0400 From: Mike Kimber To: "user@couchdb.apache.org" Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 05:46:47 -0400 Subject: RE: Am I doing something fundamentally wrong? Thread-Topic: Am I doing something fundamentally wrong? Thread-Index: Ac05eDREkxiGbmANSpWy+kFZ84oWzwAFlk2A Message-ID: References: <08E52809-C962-4E9C-AFB8-397EA201580E@utt.fr> In-Reply-To: <08E52809-C962-4E9C-AFB8-397EA201580E@utt.fr> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Aur=E9lien, Thanks for the response and apologies I didn't get a notification (e-mail) = of my original post (or the 2nd one) or your response. When I look at my or= iginal post in Google Reader is has "An error occurred while fetching this = message, sorry !", so there must be something in the e-mail that the mailin= g list system does not like. In response to your original response " I'm a bit puzzled by the fact that = your map functions use the document ID". I do this because I load the data = into Luciddb and this allows me to join between tables. This is not my end = game this is just a compromise due to the time it takes to generate a view = and my need to play/discover with the data.=20 I will look at show to see if It helps, however it does not really answer m= y original questions and it does not remove the more general issue that vie= w build takes a very long time, it only uses a single CPU and uses a bucket= load of space even with compression on (no idea why when it has a lot less= data than the original)=20 Thanks=20 Mike=20 -----Original Message----- From: Aur=E9lien B=E9nel [mailto:aurelien.benel@utt.fr]=20 Sent: 24 May 2012 07:40 To: user@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: Am I doing something fundamentally wrong? Hi Mike, > Didn't seem to get there first time so having another go As I wrote in my earlier post, the use of 'map' functions in both of your e= xamples is overkill. Use 'show' functions instead.They won't require an index to be built. Regards, Aur=E9lien