From user-return-20832-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org  Thu May 17 12:09:44 2012
Return-Path: <user-return-20832-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 480CFC23E
	for <apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:09:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 39484 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2012 12:09:42 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 39363 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2012 12:09:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.couchdb.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 39320 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2012 12:09:39 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:09:39 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lmatteis@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.54] (HELO mail-wg0-f54.google.com) (74.125.82.54)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:09:32 +0000
Received: by wgbfg15 with SMTP id fg15so1573330wgb.23
        for <user@couchdb.apache.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=vPkAOIDU5MdesGgKfnZZe92mPEXoutrjSPKzPHczR1k=;
        b=ZGQcbSC+SCt7scWqbpTzvq4Kj9BtEvG/R0B7faaorx5tqyf154Qj1LbDwo89qEYncA
         kUz7FlS3I7fUjjpfE4Mkxzlcs9KbcVZqyxUxI0S0Blf0ag6LmuGv+1Gnzf55vqxO8/1l
         1+IXRuvQr5/leMCO1fR+8GZaa/DZxN2gWlpX0tuzF/V5cx8QnvjANMHLZ7EO8sszY4w6
         IMg3jcHAc7OUBjdpfJZbOypwZenbauvUtUKIkB9Lnl+UoLaRPW5PgJO9X3TAXETEArDq
         /PDv1tdtQLvIUiM/EoQttQyCDg+BeJpQ9rGArpd/jYaJBpS9OfGZ63ZTRb0ikZ0hTP07
         2oig==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.78.9 with SMTP id x9mr17635160wiw.18.1337256551915; Thu,
 17 May 2012 05:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.44.135 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 05:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMiZLn35Uu7O+c8SfbvFSdHtdAgzs=U8kSHCCgT9PdzTZrG+XA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALp38EOi4hg_qy3nrsB-ASjXyOxXdWzP36EAC=36tkQZd=tq3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMiZLn35Uu7O+c8SfbvFSdHtdAgzs=U8kSHCCgT9PdzTZrG+XA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:09:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CALp38EO_M2CMFsb0h4tyuP2MPTPd4KivYt1_9yP3J=B9=0a0cw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hierarchical comments Hacker News style
From: Luca Matteis <lmatteis@gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Matthieu Rakotojaona
<matthieu.rakotojaona@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could emit the parent's path and the post's points, instead of the
> parent's path and the post's id : you'd have something like
>
> ["905"] // 905 points for post "1"
> ["1","36"] // 36 points for post "1/4"
> ["1","76"] // 76 points for post "1/2"
> ["1","2","14"] // 14 points for post "1/2/3"

I'm not quite sure I understand. If someone comments under "1/4", that
would emit ["1", "4", "89"], but it won't go under the correct comment
the ways you're emitting the keys. Or am I missing something?