Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 650D29BDE for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82070 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2012 09:08:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 82034 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2012 09:08:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 82026 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2012 09:08:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:08:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of arav.psgtech@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.180] (HELO mail-iy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.210.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:08:18 +0000 Received: by iage36 with SMTP id e36so1615297iag.11 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:07:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=W/2NYRPxCBJbL2WNNlCxCg9L16VaxNQ0Cnudlts9P14=; b=n5dgvo4MOSqNlLRvwUVyAWl1vqtp0crJrq0KOfxhfo+N882VyAmD6I+Z/f5k8NBSjL MrVWNf/CzKyZ9fcNhAB7dXVD9oswFyBFwyfH9UQYtJnIv4P7n5PLfhqRPyfhPErshvUy okqgFwn6O9Mf64aujCwVtsjeE8rCwTdnafoWKq880lEydFXoXuUOG1tlQHAseXCKuthv AiT5JfAqFQxmhY4jhQJIdO0L0y4tMYafLEqzt1IUPkTCTxNLPZP1zMwnDLZthuLdVArp ZtmCSJY/Wpz//dD9G3zijyPglo5XI2lb+/zWSbuPTzozuqubSBWfsom1S6ttOuTcaa6P QPoA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.45.228 with SMTP id q4mr1679280igm.58.1332925677251; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:07:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.50.209 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:07:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:37:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Compaction and replication From: Aravind Muralikrishnan To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340645812b4e04bc49f18c --14dae9340645812b4e04bc49f18c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you Stefan. On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Stefan K=F6gl wrot= e: > Hi > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Aravind Muralikrishnan > wrote: > > We have a master - slave replication setup for couchdb. > > If we compact the master couchdb database does the compaction get > > replicated to slave as well? > > If we index the master couchdb database does the indexes also get > > replicated to slave? > > No, compaction and indexing are local and have to be run on each node. > > -- Stefan > --14dae9340645812b4e04bc49f18c--