Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D76029D5B for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10740 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2012 08:32:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 10041 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2012 08:32:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 10000 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2012 08:32:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:32:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.52] (HELO mail-vw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.212.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:31:54 +0000 Received: by vbbfp1 with SMTP id fp1so261533vbb.11 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.66.166 with SMTP id g6mr531582vdt.34.1327566693137; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:31:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.199.198 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:31:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <69D2D415-F9BD-4FD5-B7A2-9B2F2E89FBE5@vpro.nl> From: Jason Smith Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:31:13 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CouchDB v1.1.1 on EPEL repository To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Sanchit Bahal wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > >>> You could ask the EPEL maintainer for the CouchDB package, but note that > EPEL stands for 'Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux', so their priority is > not always having the latest version available. > I thought that it would be someone from the CouchDB community who would > upload the latest CouchDB package to EPEL. EPEL maintainer would not > probably worry about what versions of different packages are available. > >>> You could maybe use another repository or build CouchDB yourself using > build-couchdb [0] for instance. > I would give this a try. Thanks for the link. Let me know if you have problems. I heard a report about a bug on Fedora 16 so I'll be working on Red Hat maintenance soon. -- Iris Couch