Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CD0693B0 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73577 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 00:10:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 73526 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 00:10:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 73518 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2012 00:10:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:10:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.27] (HELO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:10:28 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FCC21BC8; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:10:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:10:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iocaine.org; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=9owpOj4rnbgEub+BniwJjXHTO3Y=; b=N iV0CiYbmhz9bpw5TCrwCNsaFBBSTGerPPey9McVR+3DbBiQlfsXVBG/25jvPP/+C YC8r8Qiwt0xHwDrz8fW73X9ykWdvP8x4LZBVUdEkxzz5EChI/mGF6k5ZXyylDn5z on5HAOJEtCGVmzl9BZ/2IZr6O/X/WfYvdBsFMxiXHk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=9owpOj4r nbgEub+BniwJjXHTO3Y=; b=KjzY5Cg8oBtOI6EHzsd7zsWCZm1eKc+Deu0Qv6za Ldof2MXsflPnEtM5RLCwzshu4tQnrvvjI0ZHRPQ6CpdqASNEeP6C6NuWtSDuPgoW tTHyahlILlpBziyFDzK1W9hUNjwHvkqjIFsNoUMf8xhQvLHbfgfqLTX+Oay7zfUr DBg= X-Sasl-enc: kOwLAObLqaEwS1iduZu8RFQgcl3Wi6ORBLhX2d6bXAXY 1326327007 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3567C4825FE for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:10:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so1097776wib.11 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:10:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.107.195 with SMTP id he3mr2348451wib.13.1326327006394; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.19.17 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:10:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:10:06 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CouchDB 1.2 _restart dumps a lot of stack traces in the logs From: Dan Everton To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No, RHEL 5.6 on Erlang R15B. On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Dan Everton wrote: >> Just trying out a local build of CouchDB 1.2.0 and running the >> self-tests generates a lot of stack traces. Closer examination >> suggests these are processes/threads being killed when _restart is >> called, but it seems pretty excessive. Is this normal for 1.2? The >> self-test for 1.1.1 doesn't seem to generate these stack traces. >> >> Cheers, >> Dan > > on osx lion?