Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elf2001@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20111228185941.GA32127@urvas>
References: 
 <CAHqJuML_HvJxHq77-ZrAnsmy1qQeaYF_0TArir-=gz7F0L-GKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAL6JQihq+nVDU=Nn2S6cjJf84Q_Fysck+xrNm-0896MQ_uS6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHqJuMKGuQ50-T3VaXi=0sZQQjYuPVjg1AQm8g5-aB36dA2HDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111228185941.GA32127@urvas>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:40:26 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAHqJuM+j55+d+rz70nTZUC1GKf1K0=svY8XUL7uU7ELJUNVpRg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: couchdb disk storage format - why so large overhead?
From: Alexey Loshkarev <elf2001@gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ok, I'll try it tomorrow.

2011/12/28 Rogut=C4=97s Sparnuotos <rogutes@googlemail.com>:
> Alexey Loshkarev (2011-12-28 20:17):
>> 2011/12/28 Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com>:
>> > Future releases of CouchDB, starting with the 1.2 release, will allow
>> > for compression using google's snappy library which should greatly
>> > reduce the overhead you experience.
>>
>> Cool!
>>
>>
>> > Also be sure to compact if the
>> > ratio of disk usage to dataset size starts to grow too far. An
>> > automatic compaction daemon is also coming.
>>
>> Will wait for it!
>
> But you were already compacting after every step in your testing, weren't
> you?
>
> And, actually, these 2 features are already available in git, so it's
> "just" a matter of compiling and testing:
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Running%20CouchDB%20in%20Dev%20Mode
> If you try it out, please share your findings.
>
> --
> -- =C2=A0Rogut=C4=97s Sparnuotos
>


--=20
----------------
Best regards
Alexey Loshkarev
mailto:elf2001@gmail.com