Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C4499C32 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83340 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2011 11:40:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 83305 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2011 11:40:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 83297 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2011 11:40:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:40:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dave@muse.net.nz designates 209.85.212.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.52] (HELO mail-vw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.212.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:40:04 +0000 Received: by vbbfk1 with SMTP id fk1so3150276vbb.11 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 03:39:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.21.211 with SMTP id x19mr5557389vde.58.1324035583113; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 03:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.30.52 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 03:39:43 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [84.172.66.26] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:39:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: strange crash From: Dave Cottlehuber To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 16 December 2011 11:53, Peta Bogdan wrote: > Thank you Dave, > > The fact that there are three parallel inserts on three different tables on > the same server instance could trigger this this behaviour? No. Either your couch is running on a very small box or there's some other issue relating to erlang itself. If you revert to R14B03 and rebuild couch etc, do you get similar issues? A+ Dave