incubator-couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benoit Chesneau <>
Subject Re: to CouchApp or not to CouchApp
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:10:59 GMT
On Tuesday, August 16, 2011, Marcello Nuccio <>
> 2011/8/16 Benoit Chesneau <>:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Robert Newson <>
>>> My revised proposal was to send text/html (and 302's) in all cases
>>> except for the very specific case where the Accept header is exactly
>>> one item and that item is 'application/json'. All programmatic calls
>>> can meet that (libraries incapable of this are de facto poor
>>> libraries), and the ambiguity is vanquished.
>> <myuserdevopinion>
>> should be application/json imo. We are a document oriented db speaking
>> in json first. If someone accept text/html where the only thing we
>> send on resource is json, we should send an error by default (maybe a
>> setting could override that).
> This is not what is needed to fix the bug.
> The only requirement is: if I ask an HTML, give me an HTML, not a JSON.

that's not how the spec works.
> This is what I do if the user is authenticated, and I see no reason
> for not doing it when the response is a 401.
> Marcello

i don't follow. how it is related?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message