Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 745CB6A77 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66816 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 14:13:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 66735 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 14:13:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 66727 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 14:13:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.180] (HELO mail-iw0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:18 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so344125iwn.11 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:12:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.64.148 with SMTP id e20mr7449678ibi.91.1309270377615; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.207.220 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:12:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:12:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update CouchDB package from 0.11.2 to 1.0.2 in EPEL 5 repository From: Bade Iriabho To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517740906c5d2a704a6c643e1 --001517740906c5d2a704a6c643e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That is okay. I second that question Peter but I just wanted to know when the update will be ready (i.e. in EPEL5). Bade On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Nils Breunese wrote: > Bade Iriabho wrote: > > > I like the fact that you are working on changing the version in EPEL5 to > > 1.1.0. from 0.11.2. If this is the case when do you plan to do this? > Thanks. > > I'm not packaging anything for EPEL myself, I was just asking Peter why he > is updating the package to 1.0.x instead of 1.1.x. > > Nils. > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Nils Breunese > wrote: > > > >> Peter Lemenkov wrote: > >> > >>> As per Fedora EPEL policy I would like to inform you that I plan to > >>> upgrade CouchDB package from ancient, no longer supported and > >>> containing known security flaw 0.11.2 version to 1.0.2 one. > >>> > >>> I'm pretty sure that almost nobody is still using 0.11.2 nowadays > >>> (which means that nobody is using the package from EPEL 5 repository, > >>> even me), so this upgrade seems to be harmless. If anyone has any > >>> objections, speak now or forever hold your peace. > >> > >> I know for a fact that someone is still using the 0.11.2 package from > EPEL > >> 5, but I don't think it's a problem to update the package to 1.x. People > can > >> always choose to not upgrade. Any particular reason the package won't be > >> upgraded to 1.1.0 yet? > >> > >> Nils. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > VPRO www.vpro.nl > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --001517740906c5d2a704a6c643e1--