Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EAE36774 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82959 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 19:24:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 82928 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2011 19:24:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 82920 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2011 19:24:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:24:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jeroen.janssen@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.52] (HELO mail-yi0-f52.google.com) (209.85.218.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:24:02 +0000 Received: by yie19 with SMTP id 19so3248000yie.11 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:23:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XMK4OfjjMZKNSvxfE1mcZerjd72TkDlClL2HU73rdJs=; b=ih6p5Ctj49JoA7VI986bECPV9TmrsiudpC4MlFbGqQQ+DPLNRaE6CU+dcDEuvgM2dB xSmSfxdlYtpYNDDEWaIVCxXympAaZgqVRjRr2loH9RxHquTNL+2nAgDsaHnB/s5SUWGH iw2p6HLSBN5D2LyddbbhXQUkpIdsVRpGJwwWE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=V/BCiHUNuGoPmFLRAo7sQ5q278nGUT8BCsi5YP8odrHVgQtdTwQaba0IV5Tx2HWjsH wdqB0+s2nndSRSYRTj5N3AcGOvlpu5NPe1P7RP8sE3K1wSkGczl5dK4IYBbNDudCySib FUWvzKrGsRfUi5S3Nb7zV1A2dJCzknbsTfXJY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.127.5 with SMTP id e5mr3906164agn.173.1308425021892; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.66.19 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:23:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:23:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Update CouchDB package from 0.11.2 to 1.0.2 in EPEL 5 repository From: Jeroen Janssen To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, This is good news! Just wondering though, will this also mean that there will be an updated epel-5 couchdb package? (I am currently running the couchdb 1.0.1 from http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/peter/couchdb/epel-5/i386/ on a RHEL 5 machine). Best regards, Jeroen On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All! > > As per Fedora EPEL policy I would like to inform you that I plan to > upgrade CouchDB package from ancient, no longer supported and > containing known security flaw 0.11.2 version to 1.0.2 one. > > I'm pretty sure that almost nobody is still using 0.11.2 nowadays > (which means that nobody is using the package from EPEL 5 repository, > even me), so this upgrade seems to be harmless. If anyone has any > objections, speak now or forever hold your peace. > > -- > With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. >