From user-return-16604-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Thu Jun 9 08:07:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 718966084 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41643 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 08:07:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 41607 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 08:07:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 41599 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 08:07:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:07:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcello.nuccio@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.52] (HELO mail-vw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.212.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:07:39 +0000 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so1437837vws.11 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:07:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qAiyMlnZusUaJ5ARYewdOB732lAroIkOhDMvSasN4co=; b=Ict+8ZOrBkqElgPaDhzv1ZJ2UvVN6h+ekuRmbzas9Fvq7LQZKvHqhAwO+1qtUyCZB/ YXDtR0+WITTSJ6/3MOAfEXOhrc3lbMT8gINR2zArwySk/uQPMpRxVnuT5o2GmKh1TVah Wocva9ZtAQMugpY6itIPuOaiq5YHlNBdA/sAY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YcmAiztlVHjBcQDvlCFM0xBggVmAjnr95fuOrhPqMz6Oup4suDQ4/tc9W/t/hid0YS cFBumrBl+hnNZdY/LZT3EHfrTzHhsOI7LojczGEh0ugbydAl/xKMMQUaYY8NyodDFn5U 7hiZnwMOWOZJVEGQilmfSdujT82BEdKEBgj3M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.74.234 with SMTP id x10mr639347vdv.18.1307606838300; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 01:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.159.200 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 01:07:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DF07CAD.8000502@gmail.com> References: <4DDDFD4E.9060701@gmail.com> <4DDF164A.7030009@gmail.com> <4DDF6BEE.8070907@gmail.com> <4DE4F6F4.9000406@couchone.com> <4DECC426.9070201@gmail.com> <4DEDC36C.5090207@gmail.com> <4DEEFF3E.1070807@gmail.com> <4DEF4456.5060107@gmail.com> <4DF07CAD.8000502@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:07:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Complex queries & results From: Marcello Nuccio To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Torstein, 2011/6/9 Torstein Krause Johansen : > > On 08/06/11 19:21, Sean Copenhaver wrote: >> For stale=update_after/ok, does that mean the next query could block until >> the view updated? Even if the it was also a stale=update_after/ok query? > > I've tested this with two eternal wget loops, one running with stale=ok and > one the default non stale data setting. I think a more interesting test is with two loops, one running with stale=ok and one running with stale=update_after. I expect stale=update_after to behave the same as stale=ok but also trigger view index update. Is this true? thanks, Marcello