incubator-couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hahn <>
Subject Re: what means 'starting' in the status for a continuous replication?
Date Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:41:42 GMT
Anything that implies other than normal operation is confusing.
Seeing "starting" for more than a minute is definitely misleading.  I
don't care what it says as long as it doesn't mislead.

How about "started"?

On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Paul Davis
<> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Mark Hahn <> wrote:
>> May I suggest not calling it "starting" once it has started?  I found
>> that very confusing, and it is wrong.
> Yeah. Technically,
> "things-are-happening-but-will-happen-again-unless-we-get-to-the-first-checkpoint-so-that-we-don't-have-to-redo-this-part"
> would be more correct. If someone has a better word that summarizes
> that bit then I'd be happy to make the change, but I sure can't think
> of something better than "starting" or "initializing" or some other
> generic description that would cause less confusion.

Mark Hahn
Website Manager

View raw message