Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB6873249 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 08:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87309 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 08:14:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 87278 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 08:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 87270 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 08:14:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 08:14:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of robert.newson@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.52] (HELO mail-fx0-f52.google.com) (209.85.161.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 08:14:37 +0000 Received: by mail-fx0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 6so3303250fxm.11 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 01:14:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lvfxgCVwnu/CJ/qYDkrhdsSb+SYOtikC8rNk1fqitJ0=; b=DPrmmzrJVDOOS0JK9uTChSxA3uK+G8VClnxRRPCSdelncA3Tw7HUAcoUkSEPpmo8bv 4sk4EJRK8XOM1JE53EKq/0KsNXbP2QJWgf4TEiuAc3atWzjc8JCFhwrOwxdiMLWNk2IC 3jTxTQGO0ggFZmVwcaZ4VEVoYmv2fbV2iljtM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=OG9zq2Ba0KvPBAPGPd17Joj3QVlDvfGc+XElYjJ5jhh3YWrRTupvs3QMIHKoCsqSjX 4XyzBeBkqEC4JhVdsKCvfPzxJZoXqPMGlJ1APeUeyaow+zwGYrG//mI28HF+M+AkOx4V Lkv4NIu3ElirZmEpDS4ly0ymFeH6jp4+9wOe8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.24.72 with SMTP id u8mr2845698fab.10.1304669657631; Fri, 06 May 2011 01:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.1 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2011 01:14:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <11F5754D65FF4A2791AF80816E372FF3@rgabostyle.com> References: <5491029E-61AE-41D9-A4D8-00F97F0D5F29@apache.org> <11F5754D65FF4A2791AF80816E372FF3@rgabostyle.com> Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:14:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CouchDB 1.1 Release From: Robert Newson To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The usual thing is holding it back; Availability. We hear the desire for a 1.1 release, in fact we share it, it'll happen as soon as we can get it done, we all have day jobs too :). Hopefully soon, stay tuned. B. On 6 May 2011 08:57, Gabor Ratky wrote: > Don't mean to be pushy, but as there have been no open issues for weeks, what is holding back an official release of 1.1? I am building from the 1.1.X for testing the perf and other improvements, but would love to have an official release to work with. > > Can you give us an update, Jan? > On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >> On 20 Apr 2011, at 10:10, Couchdb Couchdb wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > What is the approximate date for 1.1 Release ? >> >> We don't set release dates. >> >> You can track progress on remaining open issues here: >> >> http://s.apache.org/couchdb-open-issues-1.1.0 >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> >> >> >> >