Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebastiancohnen@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=lwox6T+X+M4Dyw8uruUoPL2f3z0kLkzkllN2WlE5lpoxsVDiCDtYkUbBSoEF4cqMo0
         wMorWcLfDhDcNct8W3IE8T9705H7diFdRkUrvorczXyZ7LE8UINwZOmwlqWwkL/K8f7i
         9NwKCND8cMsTM3/7U3o87b+JNPz2aKH3mqGTw=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: Is Couchdb a distributed database
From: Sebastian Cohnen <sebastiancohnen@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin+eh2KTHtdGhHW+m=Kd1wWjTZ7kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 12:19:16 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <78B9387D-786A-4995-A3E6-57296E17E1B3@googlemail.com>
References: <BANLkTin+eh2KTHtdGhHW+m=Kd1wWjTZ7kw@mail.gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org

You might want to have a look at bigcouch

On 03.05.2011, at 12:16, =E5=BC=A0=E8=B7=AF wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
>   As we all know that couchdb can replication each other after we set =
the
> replicate rules.Then we can put a balancer such as nginx before
> Couchdbs(lots of Couchdb which have setted  replicate rules).
>=20
>   All of the Couchdbs have the same data among them, so the data is
> redundancy . Is there any way can solve the problem under that scene?