Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34013 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2011 03:01:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 03:01:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 99646 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 03:01:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 99604 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2011 03:01:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 99557 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2011 03:01:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 03:01:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ryan.ramage@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.54] (HELO mail-ww0-f54.google.com) (74.125.82.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 03:00:56 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so6323363wwd.23 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:00:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=frjujvClndjr9QyPKfkJbNU3QP0EZMyl54tDFxWHS0Y=; b=FqJuZ6iuo4QAhMcTlk6thjFGsI5HhUy9b+oK27tTMwSYbBpESI5kC09iv8dNDHT9Q0 5tevtNoicynnt4Qq/t6JPqpFOXkQwE4siJqOdN7ypNggMWMTs/jiWkjiRH4gVl9Dt6HE DbloofkGphqXW4YOOGjJBRFBpo3dz1I0mmMfE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e3fnp+24bfB4RnPNCBwOvZ12o5eBGs8du5K/2niHsCQUvLog2W6HPuc1BIVJutr5vu AaoOcCiIPMH1NNC1W+SubDsdbTk67sbS4hfJajsW6ORSpUjkdmlsu1/5GrvekHtwfDIL uJgT0N6zjFUA/AeR7xHaRr35qv8U2kj/zgRkw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.7.87 with SMTP id c23mr3558646wbc.108.1300676436152; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.69.83 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:00:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 21:00:36 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Your Life, On the Couch From: Ryan Ramage To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org A couple points. Here is a section from the Ecko-It FAQ http://eckoit.com/faq.html Legal questions about recording We do not provide legal advice around the use of audio recording. Please respect your regional laws. What we do believe is that what you hear is yours. Just because our brains are a little soft does not mean we should forget what we have experienced. In most places, in public there is no expectation of privacy. In private settings you may wish to inform people that you are recording. We have found that people are accepting and will soon accept it as normal. We hope that people do not use this technology as a way to litigate others or generally be bad. Liferecording should be between you and you memory. That being said, there is much talk that this would be useful in oppressive societies. People with restricted rights may find it helpful as a line of defense. I really don't want to hijack the CouchDB user list, so I have opened a thread on our list here: http://groups.google.com/group/eckoit/browse_thread/thread/637479e6e775ffeb Please feel free to continue the discussion there! Ryan On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > On 21 March 2011 14:52, Peter Nolan wrote: > > Mark, > > > > some states have laws in place that require that both parties be told o= f the > > recording. =A0I forget the states that have such laws, but be aware tha= t > > recording someone without their permission could be in violation of som= e > > state laws. > > > > quick googling turns up the following - > > http://www.callcorder.com/phone-recording-law-america.htm > > > > the states that require both party consent (according to the above link= ) is > > as follows: > > California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, > > Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. > > > > -Pete > > > > Not to mention it's common courtesy! > > In New Zealand if you're a participant then it's legal even if you > don't tell the other person: > http://www.netlaw.co.nz/crime.cfm?PageID=3D324 > > I the US it's not so straightforwards as you might think - > http://m.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/08/covert-iphone-audio-recording/ > suggests only if its actually done with intent to commit nefarious > activities. > > Cheers > Dave