From user-return-14780-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Mon Feb 07 00:04:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51402 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 00:04:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 00:04:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 4864 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 00:04:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 4701 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 00:04:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 4693 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 00:04:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:04:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of luis.junges@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.180] (HELO mail-yx0-f180.google.com) (209.85.213.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:04:09 +0000 Received: by yxd30 with SMTP id 30so1665221yxd.11 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:03:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HpOAd68FfJqXZBRJMv1OYYZSHCkEjW5APASck3QvjEw=; b=OxwxSoiLHHe37rxjM0O3UKZpXTrZQETdQk53dH4eMgNkA1LrOKdJ+vTGKtqH6TehVN 6OexuNwBMMHhMQVQWwZkCZiprMVfrTtRLtOPcnrC/OAEz5znzx0d3K4XbO5pquHe0/XO nnZIoeebCJ65//7dmW2kKlbAyEg7Taz9o8XcI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dpw45cUIRFmhvCb0DAP60t21mjRKNQnNeVpAGbNYAOmumNN2eN60aAukOJSTvrKF+U ULKS082MSztJnj/KHoKxvm4sRDeJUmMuimnQ3HIjxMxqbb9MZoPW/nVxnHZUcb6J8bgl 2P4LXIVkOAcBtsfiEQKBWbqqIe1BAQzEMvNRE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.57.15 with SMTP id f15mr7763150ana.239.1297037027907; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:03:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.232.12 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:03:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 22:03:47 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Couchdb and memcached From: Luis Carlos Junges To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6509cb84f1870049ba5f7e1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6509cb84f1870049ba5f7e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have an application running with couchdb and around 50 thounsand documents. Is is growing and start getting slower and slower. I would like to know if anyone has some comparative tests between simple couchdb application and a application with memcached as cache level. Does i= t get considerable gain with couchdb as storage service? Thanks. --=20 "A realidade de cada lugar e de cada =E9poca =E9 uma alucina=E7=E3o coletiv= a." Bloom, Howard --0016e6509cb84f1870049ba5f7e1--