Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 sebastiancohnen@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=TfMd0Pn/mfOLBYxTHz3ZDZP/8LBLrUnnJvPkhS/DvRDSQ0Y/8Ps1s0JXwZGMt8Cydv
         JeysxhjcktY1OP5fKEg9xa8rpGBv09YO99FqHfSy8O1/FfYQ9rsG/gnrq4yyOOsbqqTO
         MYLCzb5KzkIRleOPrHma1XXiFXUEeHkuRJdew=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Subject: Re: design doc weakness (one view fails = all views fail)
From: Sebastian Cohnen <sebastiancohnen@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <73295728.1269841286696237330.JavaMail.root@zimbra5-e1.priv.proxad.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:43:57 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6A4FE566-DA4B-4596-8517-91E17473B9FE@googlemail.com>
References: 
 <73295728.1269841286696237330.JavaMail.root@zimbra5-e1.priv.proxad.net>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org

Hey Mickael,

views are processed in together groups (one per design document). this =
"weakness" is - AFAIK - not really avoidable in the current =
architecture.

On 10.10.2010, at 09:37, mickael.bailly@free.fr wrote:

>=20
> Hello couchers,
>=20
> it seems that, on a design document, if there is one view having an =
error ( for example "Expression does not eval to a function" ) than all =
other views are then unusable.
> It's not critical and not a real bug, but from my point of view it's a =
weakness : one error on one part of the design doc leads to a totally =
broken app / couchapp.
>=20
> Steps to reproduce :=20
>=20
> 1/ create a new database
> 2/ Create a design doc :
>=20
>=20
> {
>   "_id": "_design/doc1",
>   "views": {
>       "v1": {
>           "map": "function() {}"
>       },
>       "v2": {
>           "map": "thefunction() {}"
>       }
>   },
>   "language": "javascript"
> }
>=20
> 3/ Create a doc :
>=20
> {
>   "_id": "doc1"
> }
>=20
> 4/ Call the "v1" view
>=20
> What's your opinion on this ? Is it worth creating a Jira bug ?
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Mickael