From user-return-13096-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Thu Oct 07 22:04:15 2010
Return-Path: <user-return-13096-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 91810 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 22:04:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 22:04:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 23041 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 22:04:13 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 22990 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 22:04:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.couchdb.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org
Delivered-To: moderator for user@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 45645 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 21:10:22 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of coldredlemur@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=tnOlDbua853lPFnGfemNmf638TGvzfokgsuoSOZUvQA=;
        b=sKm+1COvfoUO47uO/yq70Yt6rmttro2V5/kzXIiy14u48Uy9PY5ZQ969eaP8kxeOIn
         sMYzlBIDrRE31xFYEco1zoknS4/ChUvPa/2ku+3g0W0If486ICJea1jY03cTCRID05AD
         mqogJI3ez57V55inrDXUxHlwlfRuSTaYCGYIA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=hAliwbBT7l7JZZL63YqKAlrgm1mWRagCs7crVSolEC87tiLmVUSdpRu/o9IGguImiW
         ckuP1l40rDq2KHv4x4Wk2lGJs/i7q1dgWMq/KcnF2Bb4rewS9NMip+hjuRiAv0tjbiWu
         qLV4Csn481D4A5rnEM6ISSNt4zmOATlmIc7G0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: coldredlemur@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimWFr4_sBraekOi2W0=WOOFfDiXmDCDTG4QAu-W@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimWFr4_sBraekOi2W0=WOOFfDiXmDCDTG4QAu-W@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:09:55 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ExQdmM3A1do9XsLxQMbVgFQMpZQ
Message-ID: <AANLkTikUKmOmiSSpTqr5Ju_nbGCapVRk2RcvSBRUfncp@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nodejs] Scale testing node/couch apps
From: ry@tinyclouds.org
To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Cc: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:04 PM, kowsik <kowsik@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the cross-post. No, this is not a benchmark. Just some
> interesting results we got from using Studio Scale (our product)
> against an internal node/couch app we built and some things we learned
> along the way.
>
> http://labs.mudynamics.com/2010/10/06/optimizing-nodejscouchdb-apps-with-studio-scale-test/
>
> Net, net, we were seeing north of 15,000 HTTP requests/second when
> this application was deployed on a run of the mill Dell server with
> not a lot of optimizations, tuning or sharding.
>
> Thought you might find it interesting.

Wow! That is a really impressive product!