Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44232 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 12:48:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 12:48:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 46656 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 12:48:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 46392 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 12:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 46384 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 12:48:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:48:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.161.180] (HELO mail-gx0-f180.google.com) (209.85.161.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:48:05 +0000 Received: by gxk22 with SMTP id 22so3723510gxk.11 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:47:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.149.12 with SMTP id r12mr7265346ibv.185.1282049264201; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.45.81 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:47:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C6A7EA4.3010703@free.fr> References: <4C6A7EA4.3010703@free.fr> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:47:44 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: When upgrading from 1.0 to 1.0.1, some databases have illegal names others are missing From: Dave Cottlehuber To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18 August 2010 00:20, cdr53x wrote: > Hi, > > I just upgraded from 1.0 to 1.0.1 and discovered in futon some "new" > databases named 0.10/database_name, which according to the names seem to = be > dbs used on a 0.10 =A0version of couch. > > And my previous databases created in the 1.0 version are simply missing ! Hi cdrx maybe a dumb question, but might the 0.10 be desktopCouch? built into ubuntu. http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2009/09/03/desktop-couch-irc-talk I'd have thought you would have noticed this ealier though, for example with your previous 1.0 environment needing to be set up on a different port or bind address ? A+ Dave