Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94685 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2010 11:04:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2010 11:04:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 76438 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2010 11:04:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 75962 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2010 11:04:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 75954 invoked by uid 99); 13 Aug 2010 11:04:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:04:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of faust451@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:03:58 +0000 Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so669469wwf.5 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:03:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LNwoAblTYJMzuuGI5kik/XzRe52WnFUzLIOrV0etA+U=; b=V/Cm9WZ/gUVixz4OCrY6rqyl0MokCv+TkzrCDBs1S6vNlSkEeWSZNutvanT0UEo/h+ 6fmsmWiykyw8S3RfoA9SN20UKkoW6C/bWeWfuvF5kOaqVScwFQhnODAuDnoHYPtP9lmW vbjbQh5IkY/fCFc+SRDFz3vN5SajRhD/u3BRs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DgDbUOooPByS1Pr4apyAiEMrJfvifDA3ZVcGJAJfXviJRTc9H606ZauMLTQQux0Ps4 DHldo7p7ugdTZ6qWeymy3WGjbIFIXq696dtWAUwEMkthgGALQpy26+4D+fKWWrXzJ/OL 70AITay0i8Y/l4KK3EZp7QbGFnIUSdoO20UmM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.159.131 with SMTP id s3mr1083402wek.99.1281697417721; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.58.147 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:03:37 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Is it good idea put many(100 000) big attachments to single doc? From: faust 1111 To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi guy's. I have idea keep all attachments in separate db, separate from docs (its allow me replicate only docs without attachments), and in doc save link to attachment in separate db. is it possible put many(100 000) big attachments to single doc? Thanks for help!