Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80074 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2010 17:02:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2010 17:02:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 69176 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 17:02:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 68964 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 17:02:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 68956 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2010 17:02:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:02:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of norman.barker@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.180] (HELO mail-wy0-f180.google.com) (74.125.82.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:02:01 +0000 Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so6239701wyb.11 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:01:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5bbWQwAIuN8LTHx6Hj60WyAGYfmeiYqOMgDvypNCmxk=; b=L8wmLFyPOS2cWxPcc95j8BY84SrKk/c6tfXSDT6c6GNekJPQWaV8Z919KVI15hOwnx yYlMiHzc5OxNJf8MEHkyG3uC+7bNmM9XnyK+MzjT1bJ9wIhccKvv/2ts2zdjh56Sb8n8 dPpWJtRy6AAxXiIMkZS7nKUKeiOdxAYpJPFiE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=m6XEaQBZXxFhz+dt+FHu9SJoZqzFO2vI1qejw75r7AkKQa0Zd2dC1rDhLdWPdgvUGI vQRNJxMk50kRgLmDKma1igok3Q3acXYv4pB9LL5lGMbQWCrqDWJHbTzTXjeJM1Jvdbmp bXlnQri3ieLSDbPUHnJUoZQQB0NHHsvwIok6g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.129.136 with SMTP id o8mr4306609wbs.174.1280336489919; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.156.76 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:01:29 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: os_process_timeout ignored From: Norman Barker To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, is it a known bug that in 1.0 the os_process_timeout setting is ignored when using a query server? As a test case I have a working query server based on couchdb-python, with the addition of update handling. I have a simple design doc that just returns an empty doc with the id set to the current time. This works fine, I can send updates and the DB fills up. I intentionally make the python query server sleep (5 seconds seems to the trigger point) and erlang spews OS process timeout error even though the setting in local.ini is much larger than 5 seconds. I will start working through the couch code, but if this is a known bug please let me know! In the real life use case I have an executable that starts up and the first launch is slow. thanks, Norman