Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76355 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2010 17:23:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jun 2010 17:23:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 63379 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2010 17:23:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 63319 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2010 17:23:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 63311 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2010 17:23:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:23:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrew.melo@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.180] (HELO mail-gy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.160.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:22:57 +0000 Received: by gyg13 with SMTP id 13so3809206gyg.11 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:22:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qe/1RnYOdPvm0316iRpZw2tT+3QDSK9Ue7z5CBlQwGg=; b=byINMQuk/VhWkvo3oIOXx+M5gsYLovGg+6TqX9WwkKeA9PtSVtKKWl3gldbJgjvdzs Mu6b/cObNc43nPV7Pz9gR8dnw/TyDUZW3ic+9ghdXDTtz7bddmUgK+nmX3DEGxQF6+Ws qTeWSm3TKOzwssAcK/BcqmGsC1YcOt7d8SEaw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bIXeYcnf0Tjafj9vUlVhs2dq/Ikoj39s7dv0a0MkoVUryxVc5k+o917YX139rgSTtc m0cKDLzrsAXULplcVS0+fAaqiXT7pZy1YbKSIef7QqD1l1qjOoCSBDkRuiOeaic7rgBr 94d3GGVzhe4qszFYn9yi09z5bfbkA3/rggXhY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.234.21 with SMTP id g21mr7021083ybh.329.1276536156244; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.154.3 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:22:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0C254870-2C50-4DFF-859C-E19E303AE00A@gmail.com> References: <4A11BC6B-6435-47FF-B7E0-85B0A100EBC9@googlemail.com> <0C254870-2C50-4DFF-859C-E19E303AE00A@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:22:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Valid database names in 0.11 From: Andrew Melo To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5d02e22cbb9048900bc9c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd5d02e22cbb9048900bc9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:20 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote: > > On Jun 13, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > > > On 13 Jun 2010, at 19:59, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 19:57, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >>> This is not a bug, the regex to validate a db name is > >>> > >>> "^[a-z][a-z0-9\_\$()\+\-\/]*$" and has been for a while. > >>> > >>> The wiki states "The name has to start with characters." > >> > >> Except that that's false, since "_users" is now also a valid db name. > > > > Exceptions and rules :) > > yes, there are some hardcoded ok db names to start with _ > > currently > > _user > _replicator (in a patch, not in trunk yet. soon I hope) > But it's understood that _ databases are 'special', and that namespace isn't available for users either, so they shouldn't be concerned about the exception. best, Andrew > > > > > Cheers > > Jan > > -- > > > > -- -- Andrew Melo --000e0cd5d02e22cbb9048900bc9c--