Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of robert.newson@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=ommNCJ1vtAec9LZLOnlHEjhS2nQM4EbaHXCCFmF15M5F3vgUPBNXmq+vuXz/RHgZGO
         bP9nwSEvHP8UuqreHSWO0emHVlf7+43XYyR506nSju8bywKAR+IvAOpLnWXaNnqaGGi3
         JzwVx9ncXHC4HQTdZzGcXAg+VHa2DwqSXmhaI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimI9RajBqujQNIz4kEVdqp2yHu0db5t--p_uWT2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimt8I6YfvfCDSXnPmmCiupR9GQNhFWEG37Y2wYy@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinK2TBPIxw0AAdTr2mG1i9AGScHI5BYeUPwmCZD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinPBfZ7yy0KaVSE9zCqP8a7cD81xY55TbBKKBhH@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilWpQrnzzbKPlpIIfGCdR_IXBbhS2-UwSBJhBvq@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinzc2FOsaWtHRbXO-dLz7lt5rIvM0wGHFdtXWA7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimI9RajBqujQNIz4kEVdqp2yHu0db5t--p_uWT2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 11:21:21 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikDStkY2zGWugF4k8F0BmY9NiiF7XAjJ9GXEduR@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: clucene and couchdb
From: Robert Newson <robert.newson@gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

The concurrency fix was simple. I had forgotten that QueryParser was
not thread-safe and had allowed multiple threads to access the same
instance concurrently. ApacheBench now confirms that concurrent
searching works as expected.

You couldn't trigger these problems via the Python script, since that
serializes all requests, but my main motivation for moving
couchdb-lucene onto its own port in 0.5 was to allow direct,
concurrent querying.

B.

On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Norman Barker <norman.barker@gmail.com> wrote:
> Itamar,
>
> I posted on clucene, one of the main problems is that Java Lucene
> allows storing UserData which CLucene doesn't, this allows the couchdb
> seq_num to be stored in the Lucene index keeping it in synch.
>
> Robert, can you expand on the concurrency fix, surely stdin / stdout
> is still the bottle neck?
>
> Norman
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Jarrod Roberson <jarrod@vertigrated.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Robert Newson <robert.newson@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Everything I have testwise is at http://github.com/rnewson/couchdb-lucene
>>>
>>> I understand the reluctance to pull in the Java Virtual Machine just
>>> to use Lucene but, in my experience, there's no other comparable
>>> library for features or performance, including clucene.
>>>
>>>
>> then you haven't seen Xapian then, much better choice if you aren't already
>> using Java.
>>
>