Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10923 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2010 16:06:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jun 2010 16:06:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 71950 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 16:06:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 71848 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2010 16:06:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 71840 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2010 16:06:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:06:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jchris@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.52] (HELO mail-pw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.160.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:06:01 +0000 Received: by pwj1 with SMTP id 1so3369622pwj.11 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=S8IpT1wxY1vNPMXCwQCqQalC8PDFAoUx+oWlBMmc7Wg=; b=T0ZBpzKW6X6IU6oXivLYuqisPPVXWhxRpmBMyBI4Q4POh/0IbJpYU21Y5ll94Vj7JK NO3IhGbfg22Zkhd9ud/pE3TuDD6E0HwG9b17T/7kvGmALqpmotSZm3Ak4nn/sH/sSwSJ 0ECm8rZ/4gD5mFLRazKIUgYX2DWrjhpUfDZ4o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=JPhPRVGXNu9eSHKMm66XDHmCCCSIRD/Cy8IH3vJbz07uXcKA/VhdouT8j+5XtUPb/t rCQ9nzJe8l89QeM/sQCdO2ZGehspj5rPzFRMuzztClBVeO8h7OjTEjmXSg4bhQ9c+Lh6 7sjRPJg4U2sTcDiz4z6oJAdSLTJdmQT3v0e/Y= Received: by 10.141.100.21 with SMTP id c21mr7240832rvm.101.1276704339822; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-248-172-14.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.248.172.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l29sm7115403rvb.4.2010.06.16.09.05.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Subject: Re: CouchDB on an old machine From: J Chris Anderson In-Reply-To: <2871726D-C34E-4E47-A4D1-C39FFB88D2DE@orego.fr> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:05:36 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <86069FEE-F9AD-46E4-8395-9259B22EE3BC@gmail.com> References: <2871726D-C34E-4E47-A4D1-C39FFB88D2DE@orego.fr> To: user@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 16, 2010, at 3:32 AM, Martin Kirchgessner wrote: > Hi fellow relaxed users, >=20 >=20 > I'm planning to set up CouchDB in an old Linux box, but I'm wondering = if it's not too old : 400Mhz PentiumII, 128Mb of RAM, ~1To of storage. >=20 > My app will manage around 10k documents, each of them will have ~7Mo = of files attached. It will only be used by my family so I don't expect = much traffic. >=20 > =46rom your own experiences, can it work? yes it should be fine. thats more power than some virtualized servers = that people use. >=20 >=20 > Martin Kirchgessner