Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93009 invoked from network); 14 May 2010 09:11:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 May 2010 09:11:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 42103 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2010 09:11:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 42063 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2010 09:11:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 42055 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2010 09:11:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 May 2010 09:11:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.227.126.186] (HELO moutng.kundenserver.de) (212.227.126.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 May 2010 09:11:38 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.127] (xdsl-89-0-191-165.netcologne.de [89.0.191.165]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LwXB1-1NErda2hxP-018Nnt; Fri, 14 May 2010 11:11:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4BED13B2.1020104@digitalgott.de> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:11:14 +0200 From: "c.Kleinhuis" Reply-To: ck@digitalgott.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@couchdb.apache.org Subject: arguments for couchdb - binary data output ? References: <4FD426D8-F807-4FCE-8B98-36B9B0B2C058@googlemail.com> <4BEBCDAB.4070708@digitalgott.de> <20100513160136.GB9782@seblaptop> <4BEC2A4C.4090303@digitalgott.de> <2C9F0F2E-F87B-4BC7-B55D-7D7A2E965428@googlemail.com> <4BEC43B3.8070807@digitalgott.de> <5625AF56-BC6C-4C4E-A675-1D47711C97B9@googlemail.com> <02D23147-0128-454A-87BF-169CDE6D35CF@gmail.com> <4BEC4F33.7060503@digitalgott.de> <4BEC5694.2050205@digitalgott.de> <3041A366-8876-4C76-89E2-981863C9A3FA@gmail.com> <4BEC5E21.4020604@digitalgott.de> <73395B99-69DC-4812-A6C2-58A98B7A6D44@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <73395B99-69DC-4812-A6C2-58A98B7A6D44@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/rQxb+O46iVoSDg4QWxg+NcJ8wO37uAKVQhfw K/uzwMCgEcf2Kxd63JPXZQxokV2q8svWtXtRFpNqJW6pXa7gOJ 76ebEyekBIKLVcEvtyWC9R839MY5DlY X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, one more question is, how is json output comparable to direct binary output, in my eyes the json is the compactest human readable transfer format, and the difference json<->binary is far less than compared to xml<->binary what do you think ? thx ck