Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4BEC5E21.4020604@digitalgott.de>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 22:16:33 +0200
From: "c.Kleinhuis" <ck@digitalgott.de>
Reply-To: ck@digitalgott.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Subject: Re: arguments for couchdb ?!
References: <AANLkTimb6aZ0PY75tUYoOB1tVcooFfHwjXuQMCDjvHkt@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FD426D8-F807-4FCE-8B98-36B9B0B2C058@googlemail.com>
 <4BEBCDAB.4070708@digitalgott.de>
 <AANLkTikgHoM8publkQ1wWxMaJksZ_0OIEe43cZgFS63W@mail.gmail.com>
 <20100513160136.GB9782@seblaptop> <4BEC2A4C.4090303@digitalgott.de>
 <2C9F0F2E-F87B-4BC7-B55D-7D7A2E965428@googlemail.com>
 <4BEC43B3.8070807@digitalgott.de>
 <5625AF56-BC6C-4C4E-A675-1D47711C97B9@googlemail.com>
 <02D23147-0128-454A-87BF-169CDE6D35CF@gmail.com>
 <4BEC4F33.7060503@digitalgott.de>
 <C4D26E40-B531-440F-BDE0-2AD880D02C7D@gmail.com>
 <4BEC5694.2050205@digitalgott.de>
 <3041A366-8876-4C76-89E2-981863C9A3FA@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3041A366-8876-4C76-89E2-981863C9A3FA@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Alexander Uvarov schrieb:
> On 14.05.2010, at 1:44, c.Kleinhuis wrote:
>
>   
>> hi there,
>>
>> is there a comparison between hibernate/spring and couchdb ?
>>
>> to convience my project manager
>>
>> -in my eyes the main benefit of couchdb is that it removes a complete application tier,
>> the java/server side, which maps objects to tables. the relaxing effect :D
>>
>> - here is a performance comparison:
>>
>> http://metalelf0dev.blogspot.com/2008/09/mysql-couchdb-performance-comparison.html
>> it is rather old (2008), and just displays that indexing is a bit slower, which shouldnt
>> be a problem 
>>
>> if there are any more arguments, please let me know, also i would like
>> to have some examples of HUGE Sites using couchdb, 
>> thx
>> ck
>>
>>     
>
> Good:
>
> 1. Schema-less is awesome for a lot of applications
> 2. RESTful JSON store
> 3. Document attachments
> 4. Views are fast
> 5. Full text search "out of the box" with couchdb-lucene
>
> Bad:
>
> 1. Does not support transactions and AFAIK there are no plans to directly support transactional bulk document API
>   
this is handled via eventual consistency as far as i know, and will 
never be adressed ;)
with the benefit of fast responses

> 2. It's impossible to just say "update/delete all people where some field LIKE something", but actually not a problem
ok

what about server configuration ? compared to mysql/hibernate/spring/java ?
as far as i can tell for windows, it worked nicely with the installer, 
any known problems
when setting up a server farm, or a single system ? ! i mean, how hard 
would it be for
an advanced admin to set up a system with couchdb ?