Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61412 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 19:24:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 19:24:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 25826 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 19:24:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 25794 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 19:24:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 25786 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 19:24:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:24:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jameshfisher@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.24] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:24:43 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so433905eyf.41 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:24:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3tbj62ehqS1Xhq+92W8IRcDizyxeaVdIxvHB8p73r4I=; b=IjVnliwax3bHjeMx3tB3SKihZ2b4LYEIfve7WqNj99sw2VDS7Y8LxKz9u6en8YUXAr za34EWjplqJaDrlhiI9/i0QGJ3YK+zXxGyu1bLUkl3zRLpPb6Rj972fLnSyz94Xd06fE 6kQBa+jMHGT7rLvPzhRyGAGj8yIFHHzMa995M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lHTxdHpLzfEQ2hhqVhU2I81raB8rJekZ5f9581UMxZDnw9+47Am272ABifUh0mMnsy gti1vMcINCTvcdDEhdubJiSXaUztni5lXSVSsopePRUXB1tGPwfDOlz34zssB3n6915d VU81PGP7EgGZog/31ctX4BP0RyN+4V4vcmNcU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.39.209 with SMTP id h17mr2526867ebe.56.1271705062379; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.28.79 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:24:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <450F98C4-BEC6-49AE-BC1F-70BC864ECB6F@me.com> <20100413233908.GE2548@wladimir> <4BC58B19.3000100@julianmoritz.de> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:24:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CouchDB brand identity and design of couchdb.apache.org From: James Fisher To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0014852f5ae080937404849be896 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0014852f5ae080937404849be896 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Paul Bonser wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:25 AM, James Fisher >wrote: > > > OK, I'm still at the messing-around-in-Inkscape stage, but this is how > > things stand (ignore the schema diagram thing, which will obviously be > > redone): http://i43.tinypic.com/23wsapl.jpg > > > > I know you said the diagram still needs to be redone, but I'm pretty sure > there's no Lucene integration built-in anymore, is there? > > Nope. Basically, I'm waiting for someone to confirm that the diagram sans Lucene is still the best way of representing Couch (I'm hazy on its internals), before I make any headway on it. > -- > Paul Bonser > http://probablyprogramming.com > --0014852f5ae080937404849be896--