Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.218 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=XF+h/tNWALv3gCBS8846Drn/rdYw+LGltZG93YtyX1r9qGLUIqi60ykI+17jitqqjt
         x3GaETvIwYWUPC6KxfLve4OicI9g2+l7M2kHUQEWtXoV1kOB5PY/1M/LhlIKjNS7GwAm
         K0ilFkVqu0d6HxrFq99x1W+tCtEo8iCaKyfnk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20100324094257.GB5069@uk.tiscali.com>
References: <b7cd8ed11003230249x7515178bnce4d3e299a249c30@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ec7a93a1003231138q3f9a79a0m289aaec9e86e01cc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b7cd8ed11003231413v70cc4b20r2a4721bd9fae033e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ec7a93a1003231625he1799d9uea9dbe6816a37c3c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ec7a93a1003231626h6d8b3dbcv7d532a1d7476844b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b7cd8ed11003240121k7e8d48d6g45e45fbbc7eb32f1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20100324094257.GB5069@uk.tiscali.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:06:34 +0100
Message-ID: <b7cd8ed11003240506s11a7659fw549ab8189363f61d@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: how do you manage re-indexation time of big datasets
From: Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:21:31AM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> i would prefer to have a slower indexation and less CPU used.
>
> nanosleep()?
>

I'm not sure it would solve the stuff. Maybe queuing view indexation.
But i really would like to understand why it has to take so much CPU.

- benoit