Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45186 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 08:22:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 08:22:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 16631 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 08:22:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 16461 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 08:22:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 16453 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2010 08:22:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:22:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.180] (HELO mail-pv0-f180.google.com) (74.125.83.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:21:53 +0000 Received: by pvc22 with SMTP id 22so3608484pvc.11 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:21:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8cb0RD0X/Tv2+Rarz0edcR8eMfaB2EgyP25EkdP/USY=; b=SBgOfrdq1PIDgQ9T7nsxD6sANLCl+EdeVwLDnTVlieGncigQNadf4DIqUNk7fFvhXc 2DHvrIGk4Hfzuu8at3B0UETw7+1r0GbnaUyhle9ZBBFfCK5Oq6ITKJN5P1Kb8ehQ8z2l R+1TVCVp+Yi6eqOnS/GA0zaSWCgn6p9Y5j+N8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nDO8rTeTZXn8ksIOsxI9DYpeTzTju7CcbztBeZlu6pMhmOZBSpNYaOk3Stk8zka27c /8raASeUWE4wefGG+8NELiWTZ9d/uvRNVXtNilZbzMG1gtXa0oMAvl2iAVIeC4rpqqkB 98FDMrVLLok6Kkoc8QELslaJRXk1CL95pm3ag= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.23.13 with SMTP id a13mr8436407rvj.209.1269418891651; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:21:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:21:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how do you manage re-indexation time of big datasets From: Benoit Chesneau To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Randall Leeds wrote: > Maybe you could setuid a little program that calls nice(), drops privs and > then exec's couchjs? Set this up as your js view server. > I thought about that. But the main usage of CPU is done by couchdb erlang core itself. I'm not sure what's causing such CPU usage anyway. i would prefer to have a slower indexation and less CPU used. Maybe Damien could explain it. Anyway thanks for your help. - benoit