Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82973 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2010 16:42:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Feb 2010 16:42:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 22012 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2010 16:42:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 21951 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2010 16:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 21941 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2010 16:42:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:42:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of senthilkumar.peelikkampatti@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.223] (HELO mail-gx0-f223.google.com) (209.85.217.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:41:55 +0000 Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so1246220gxk.15 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:41:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SzwMLxgOCRQlHYcZljaLkf/DtOY4qCpmJKbn/bAjDmk=; b=l/K8+q/GnHBI6vvosBr17Sq0YW+ioq9NCfYSBFUaLulrGYA1EJig0/GGzJtXCsQn01 fVcKfxTpXhWlxjFHKzotiB/k+f3hSgCt10E+T1H6VoIMe5pF9x5YRnxiPn8xnUuj/zi8 +73gmgyFV7NwqZr/uiKBPM45P0bfPCKzN4sZ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SE07rgZgfuNPi98hVS3+H625JVQpOM7nStpma/hD9MNizRiA3qQGSBnlRPqgPUVA/u 0Jw0qqpnLwVi+zBtL+c5csxtJJgD+j597h2Ix9JfWHBKgCLP3ZkimDeeeSKiyCde4DzM UPV4IQWptQ5LfibnutS1zFaptweCcSEZA7mzM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.4.25 with SMTP id 25mr11109006ybd.285.1266424893950; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:41:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <45d8e23d1002161830p65ef3ff3wcdb7b5685237cff8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:41:33 -0600 Message-ID: <45d8e23d1002170841x4e21609cx976e242462bb40df@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: two view questions: group=true, inverted indices From: Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I recently asked Mark one of the erlang CMS creator, why can't they use couchdb, he said he is considering it but sitting on the fence as couch doesn't have native erlang interface. I may be wrong but focus on such an interface is not there from my perspective. I also aware of few threads in this forum looking for native interface and pure erlang based FTI (reason behind this is either their system does't use Java or complexity of setting up and configuring and backing up/restoring) is not seemless and fluid as couchdb. There are other reason too. If one the committers start the foundation work, people like me jump in as and when time permits and contribute. I also aware of davisp has something about FTI (http://www.davispj.com/2008/09/25/introducing-efti.html) but I was not able to locate that in github. Joe Armstrong has foundation code (indexer, porter stemmer etc) in his github repository. So we have pieces of code available and need to integrate it with couchdb in coudhdb way. Thats why I was telling committer's commitment to FTI. On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 17 Feb 2010, at 02:30, Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti wrote: > >> I think couchdb committers should support and encourage this kind of initiative. > > How? -- Regards, Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti, http://pmsenthilkumar.blogspot.com/