incubator-couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicholas Orr <nicholas....@zxgen.net>
Subject Re: Best way to store 2^32 IPs in CouchDB
Date Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:20:47 GMT
Also have a look at this thread

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201001.mbox/%3Chi57et$19n$1@ger.gmane.org%3E



On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Santi Saez <santisaez@woop.es> wrote:
> > El 01/02/10 17:56, Paul Davis escribió:
> >
> > Dear Paul,
> >
> >> Well, 2^32 of anything is 4GiB per byte stored. So, minimum of four
> >> bytes and you're at 16GiB. Even with just 1KiB overhead you're at
> >> 4TiB.
> >>
> >> I'm left wondering why you would want to store a list of numbers in
> >> the first place.
> >
> > Imagine a service like Netcraft.
> >
> > I know that there aren't 2^32 active servers, but I wanted to test it
> with
> > 4.3 billion documents and stress/benchamark CouchDB with other DBs.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Santi Saez
> > http://woop.es
> >
>
> If you're looking for benchmark data I'd also suggest something like
> the Enron email dataset. I can't imagine 4.3 billion integer documents
> is going to be very informative about real world usage. The Wikipedia
> abstracts data set another candidate as well.
>
> HTH,
> Paul Davis
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message