Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29888 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2009 23:35:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2009 23:35:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 72460 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2009 23:35:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 72369 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2009 23:35:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 72359 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2009 23:35:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:35:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.68.5.16] (HELO relay02.pair.com) (209.68.5.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:34:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 13308 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2009 23:34:36 -0000 Received: from 75.143.234.216 (HELO ?192.168.1.6?) (75.143.234.216) by relay02.pair.com with SMTP; 1 Nov 2009 23:34:36 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 75.143.234.216 Message-Id: <22DD7B14-0DCA-4296-9A60-E9FC49063FF5@apache.org> From: Damien Katz To: user@couchdb.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20091101212933.GA19849@uk.tiscali.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: What happens with a document, if a conflict is not resolved? Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 18:34:36 -0500 References: <174C73E6-6CE5-4DEC-A82E-D4EBED5B5A31@apache.org> <20091101212933.GA19849@uk.tiscali.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) On Nov 1, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Brian Candler wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 06:46:24AM -0400, Damien Katz wrote: >>> * Application writer curses couchdb, and curses the person who wrote >>> "Most applications require no special planning to take advantage of >>> distributed updates and replication". >> >> It sounds like the dev didn't read the documentation. > > I believe the documentation is weak in this area, but I am > attempting to > improve it. I forgot in my last response, but I've noticed and thank you very much :) -Damien