Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49023 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2009 17:08:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2009 17:08:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 82994 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 17:08:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 82911 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2009 17:08:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 82898 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2009 17:08:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:08:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zachary.zolton@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.211 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.211] (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (209.85.218.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:07:51 +0000 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so161228bwz.11 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:07:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HaIsZ+T7DYBq+2gV/UXy+A+yQHKnibc4aVBGQCTwSgQ=; b=K6bjtEjubwGpv6FEslDJQC5agm+dCNsgcCAgP6wO4F9/SOrpOheDQyfeqbBnYKnjIm T4yL5ptj8mKxcO/5TXQaEN/Y8bVIJ15t53JIArjfx0M1xs9+qMw2TgnBd0NNo20LYfB4 xnAgWhL6Q6Q2g90KFBkEHR1H53nahyrzcsGhs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vm8Yi61FHqPQ8uVAfSoCMtY7BNXHoHF5vz41I5j1tmWNMPWe55QpLEG0NptuyWr88c fLPHghJ7uATGf1GNuKWkNjwBko1pibVKjvTNRB0zCUXYVBri/nkFmqXR1CRsP+Rc3VRG Fo96OX2ePBaUQTk3DRo2b4EZmmTkfLDDiU1VQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.23 with SMTP id e23mr5729635bkw.127.1251824851084; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:07:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Zachary Zolton Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:07:11 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Views per design doucment To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Basically, each application that uses a database should correspond to a different design doc: http://books.couchdb.org/relax/design-documents/design-documents#Applicatio= ns%20are%20Documents On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm confused about how I should split my views up between design > documents. =A0I understand that the all the views in a design document > are reindexed together, but this doesn't give me any feel for how I > should split views up across design documents. =A0My feeling is to stick > with one view per design document, unless there is some compelling > reason otherwise (e.g. minor variations on the same theme). =A0Is this > what other people do? =A0Any suggestions? > > Thanks, > > Hadley > > -- > http://had.co.nz/ >