Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ppaaff@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.163 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
         :mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer;
        b=DeOmoKVhXG3Ulf5H4CW7X7mysBARJKNXoiF9e5NPSAOjDu8gkWTI/zEk+syo/nx1qM
         gqH4bHqlbIpHdAlVv3V//utLs3vym00SfMus2Nss9EVBFxELVR09wNYimS6KBoVZLwUC
         hkpLnFxra8y4//fXnhxawaFiPeSnVytMS0vjg=
Message-Id: <776C2F6C-1B26-4BBB-A233-BF698F23E74B@gmail.com>
From: Patric Fors <ppaaff@gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: "view_conflicts" test fail
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 23:44:50 +0200

Hi,

Should I be worried that the "view_conflicts" test fail in the Test =20
Suite?
I mean, is it the test that fails, or is it couchdb that fails the =20
test. :-)

I was installing CouchDB for the first time, no prior installation (or =20=

knowledge on my part), and ran the Test Suite to verify the =20
installation.
First all passed but not "stats", it failed, that was the only time it =20=

failed ("view_conflicts" passed at that test run).

On later runs all pass with the exception of "view_conflicts", that =20
fails with:
view_conflicts   failure   1084ms	=95 Assertion failed: =20
results.rows[0].value[0] =3D=3D conflictRev

Output from console from a test run where "view_conflicts" fail the =20
test:
http://sites.google.com/site/ppaaff/Home/couchdb


/Patric=