incubator-couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: The sum function (used in reduce)
Date Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:41:34 GMT
Wojciech Kaczmarek wrote:
> 2009/4/25 Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com>:
>   
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Wojciech Kaczmarek
>> <kaczmarek.w@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> So the result of CouchApp push are just injected code chunks, right?
>>> What about code size for really complicated macro sets, is it
>>> irrelevant in practice?
>>>       
>> Yeah, the code is just injected inline. I wouldn't worry about code
>> size unless you're doing something fairly strange. For normal use
>> which includes things like pulling in entire templating systems I've
>> never heard of an issue.
>>     
>
> And what about handmade view servers in other languages? Is function
> hashing/storing done by couchdb itself and viewserver:add_fun receives
> the function text to execute, but doesn't care about storing?
>   
Yup. The view server doesn't care about the signatures. The logic for 
when to reindex what is all handled in Erlang.

HTH,
Paul Davis

Mime
View raw message