Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29915 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2009 18:43:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2009 18:43:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 85624 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2009 18:43:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 85538 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2009 18:43:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 85528 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2009 18:43:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:43:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nexneo@me.com designates 17.148.16.86 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.148.16.86] (HELO asmtpout011.mac.com) (17.148.16.86) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:43:32 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Received: from spool002.mac.com ([10.150.69.52]) by asmtp011.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KH800LYVBZIUE10@asmtp011.mac.com> for user@couchdb.apache.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail034 ([10.13.128.34]) by spool002.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KH800GSEBZITM60@spool002.mac.com> for user@couchdb.apache.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:12:54 +0500 From: Niket Patel To: user@couchdb.apache.org Message-id: <165314187940923948587200930699180100072-Webmail@me.com> In-reply-to: <51A1B0A1-6AF7-428F-B539-1539079BE44A@apache.org> References: <163018811858886251637007574048906570002-Webmail@me.com> <5aaed53f0903280905v1e10d5a6pa1108ee97d704dc3@mail.gmail.com> <119595333352320239141241122882408242496-Webmail@me.com> <51A1B0A1-6AF7-428F-B539-1539079BE44A@apache.org> Subject: Re: Discard old version while update document Received: from [117.196.2.87] from webmail.me.com with HTTP; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:12:54 +0500 Received: from [ 204.2.199.92] from webmail.me.com with HTTP; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:12:54 +0500 X-Originating-IP: 117.196.2.87, 204.2.199.92 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >Whether that reduction from quadratic to linear metadata growth is a >big win for you depends on the frequency of updates and the size of >the document. If the frequently-updated documents are really large >the DB file size growth will be dominated by document data rather than >the revision metadata. Hope it helps, > Certainly it helped, I will do some testing to understand benefit clearly for my use case but seems like the thing I wanted to know. Thanks - Niket