incubator-couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gianugo Rabellino <gian...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Naming/branding/forking
Date Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:25:19 GMT
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Antony Blakey <antony.blakey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2009, at 12:06 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
>> Then you're all set - as long as you use a frozen, unmodified version.
>> The moment you turn it into a derivative work, you can't call it
>> CouchDB anyrmore.
>
> Sure, our way is clear. We aren't shipping CouchDB. Makes my CouchDB Ltd
> data point somewhat moot.
>
> Interesting issue though, given tools such as GIT that make cherry picking
> patches so easy - we could construct an artifact by re-ordering or leaving
> out certain patches, that wouldn't be a derived work because every component
> is part of the official version.


Yeah, though I'd still contend that if you cherry-pick and reassemble,
you end up with a derived work nevertheless. But this is getting OT.

Ciao,

-- 
Gianugo Rabellino
Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com
(blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)

Mime
View raw message