incubator-couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [user] Re: The Blog
Date Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:08:05 GMT
On 9 Feb 2009, at 16:55, Adam Petty wrote:

> -- as for an example db issue...
> For some reason -  without transactions the RDBMS people at my work  
> seem to
> not want to consider couch for anything having to do with money.

Somebody should tell them that banks have since moved
to eventually consistent data storage for most but the most
heavyweight (money-)transactions.

Cheers
Jan
--

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org>  
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 04:18:09PM +0100, Wout Mertens wrote:
>>> To be honest, I think saying RDBMS and CouchDB are for different
>>> solutions is just you guys being nice. I think that any application
>>> would benefit from using the CouchDB model and only in very  
>>> specific,
>>> very demanding cases an RDBMS would be better. I can't think of any
>>> examples though.
>>
>> Not really, I just like avoiding the flames. Heh heh.
>>
>> I see where you want to go with this, and I agree that some  
>> applications
>> are
>> better suited to CouchDB, but I think it's often a blurry line, and  
>> you
>> will
>> draw fire from the RDBMS people for anything too concrete.
>>
>> --
>> Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
>>


Mime
View raw message