Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33748 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2009 17:34:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2009 17:34:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 1611 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2009 17:34:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 1582 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2009 17:34:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 1440 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2009 17:34:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:34:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.13] (HELO mail-ew0-f13.google.com) (209.85.219.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:34:28 +0000 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so8129392ewy.11 for ; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:34:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.120.7 with SMTP id s7mr21127965ebc.184.1230917645890; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:34:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.121.18 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:34:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <905d10ce0901020934o456aeee1o1c8fa1f88959c3d3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 09:34:05 -0800 From: "Scott Robertson" To: user@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: group_level and intermediate reduce results In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <905d10ce0812311448p756d8931h8600491f1c847ca7@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > > If you have the results of group_level=2 for a range you can calculate > the group_level=1 results trivially on the client. > > True it's trivial with the example I gave, that's because I gave a trivial example. My actual reduction is more complex. I'd rather not have to maintain two separate code bases if possible.