Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6680 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2009 01:00:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2009 01:00:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 63380 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2009 01:00:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 63346 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2009 01:00:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 63335 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2009 01:00:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:00:18 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dundeemt@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.224] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:00:10 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so1850402rvb.35 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:59:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kydlFu/GbpFoGQqP/pl1naWnQVDfcRDay6WdZe9M8TY=; b=NeAJ1qPKRCMBNTZ+YZWS1FNWR7/gI5DkVdUktFQraS6GCNR4m/CJ+lX24566dG6g3s WI9HhdrbXZJ6Y6T2x05QRbK/ZwmyBnqzI+I5JD630QnCYTPABtokha+QKuXx7sOtTI5t vh8mgRl0VHIHx/kvsuZGYXvRl8giVfKdt4JT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=aeOkxcZKdCtf22ARc1o9bV/ezgM/TJ72FVYwqdI6WNZwpZx9X3Bar5NivPGaHKB7bk AnsRVBV+gAVs/b3YUq9rbt+pf6zaYm7MPEnxznRqhXyQmtXS6c1JKq6OTJUAAM93jKCT 2ZfDbyssvjrnC3OADBQrcQl/9K87pcrRpONvU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.193.15 with SMTP id q15mr1489512rvf.274.1232153989821; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:59:49 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: tech@dundeemt.com In-Reply-To: <630444.43771.qm@web57613.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <630444.43771.qm@web57613.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:59:49 -0600 Message-ID: <5aaed53f0901161659m6fc46358i9b18603a15f1deef@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Better way to count attachments? From: "Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T" To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2118edf37720460a334c1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2118edf37720460a334c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Bradford Winfrey wrote: > I thought spidermonkey provided a __count__ method, sorry to justtjink > aloud, out and about at the moment > > I had assumed so to, but gave up after 30 minutes or so of looking/banging -- figured I'd post what I have working and see if someone knew better. Thanks and Have a good time. ;) -jeff --000e0cd2118edf37720460a334c1--