On Oct 27, 2008, at 17:15, Dean Landolt wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> >> On Oct 27, 2008, at 16:53, Ben Nevile wrote: >> >> >>>> First off to alay your main concern, view indexes are not >>>> completely >>>> regenerated on each update. Its only a diff. >>>> >>>> >>> Presumably reduce operations have to operate on the entire set >>> every time? >>> >> >> Nope, reduce results are stored in the btree back nodes. > > > Or...that. > > Jan -- can you speak to what that means? Back nodes? See http://horicky.blogspot.com/2008/10/couchdb-implementation.html Cheers Jan --