incubator-couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@prima.de>
Subject Re: Lucene
Date Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:07:48 GMT
Heya,

On 28 Mar 2008, at 04:18, Soren Hilmer <sh@widetrail.dk> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have something running now (took a while as I wanted to run Java  
> remote
> debugging, and Java insists on supplying a greating on stdout, so I  
> had to
> put a handle_info clause in couch_db_update_notifier.erl to get it  
> working,
> uhmm i like Erlang)
>
> Now I am onto the using the design document approach, and it got me  
> thinking.
> Now the code uses the database "couchdbfulltext" to store documents  
> with
> databases to index. My initial though was then to put the design  
> documents
> into this database, as it is close to the existing model. But why  
> not get rid
> of the "couchdbfulltext" database entirely and put the design  
> documents in
> the database to index, that way a database is indexed if it has the  
> specific
> design document and otherwise not. Makes sense?

Yeah, totally. That is actually what I proposed earlier. Sorry if I  
didn't make my point clear :)

I don't think requiring a separate database is a good idea.

Thanks for putting work into this!

Cheers
Jan
--

>
>
> --Søren
> -- 
> Søren Hilmer, M.Sc., M.Crypt.
> wideTrail                       Phone:  +45 25481225
> Pilevænget 41           Email:  sh@widetrail.dk
> DK-8961  Allingåbro     Web:    www.widetrail.dk
>

Mime
View raw message