Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPaJBx43qyB-Hk4K2Pw3VsukW5VypfemxQVSKEcasakDr1ZtMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51A8C604.3000104@apache.org>
	<CABvT1DHZVvcPdp=RmHERtCMpvBsW1H=bhrisSbhhd+KMd7GyXQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPaJBx43qyB-Hk4K2Pw3VsukW5VypfemxQVSKEcasakDr1ZtMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 18:41:42 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CABvT1DGWpwJ=37_t6X-=mTgZA8AZhXkaeqQ+GE8VhoeGMxCScg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [REQUEST] Update on using git
From: Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
To: "dev@couchdb.apache.org" <dev@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

What's not concluded in this thread?

B.


On 4 June 2013 18:04, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> Bob, are you able to help drive the Git thread to conclusion? We need to
> clarify this and document it. Think a lot people are confused right now
> since it seems everything is in the air.
>
>
> On 31 May 2013 16:51, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> master, as usual, and the x.y.z branches (for backports). All other
>> branches should be feature or fix branches we've not deleted.
>>
>> B.
>>
>> On 31 May 2013 16:47, Wendall Cada <wendallc@apache.org> wrote:
>> > I'm fairly well versed in using git and different workflows, rebase, etc.
>> > However, I'm utterly confused as to how I might contribute changes to
>> > couchdb, what branches are relevant, etc. Is there documentation for
>> this,
>> > or a clear summary of decisions made?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Wendall
>>
>
>
>
> --
> NS