incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] dont't abuse of "lazy concensus" on mail tagged [DISCUSS]
Date Tue, 07 May 2013 20:10:33 GMT
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm not sure I fully agree. All the lazy consensus's of late have had
> a 72 hour window on them which is the same duration we use for couchdb
> releases.
>
> However, we can discuss what the minimum lazy consensus period can be
> based on what the minimum time that community members feel they can
> respond.
>
> I don't mean this as horribly as it will sound, but, to a degree, if
> someone can't take the time, in 3 days, to reply with '-1' to a
> thread, perhaps that's a problem too? The whole point of lazy
> consensus is to move forward quickly. We don't always need to wait for
> a large number of +1's to get work done.
>
> Finally, I'll agree that lazy consensus can be used inappropriately, I
> just don't think I agree that it's happened yet.

+1 to all of that.

Cheers,

Dirkjan

Mime
View raw message