incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] dont't abuse of "lazy concensus" on mail tagged [DISCUSS]
Date Tue, 07 May 2013 23:39:13 GMT

On May 7, 2013, at 22:10 , Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl> wrote:

> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>> I'm not sure I fully agree. All the lazy consensus's of late have had
>> a 72 hour window on them which is the same duration we use for couchdb
>> releases.
>> 
>> However, we can discuss what the minimum lazy consensus period can be
>> based on what the minimum time that community members feel they can
>> respond.
>> 
>> I don't mean this as horribly as it will sound, but, to a degree, if
>> someone can't take the time, in 3 days, to reply with '-1' to a
>> thread, perhaps that's a problem too? The whole point of lazy
>> consensus is to move forward quickly. We don't always need to wait for
>> a large number of +1's to get work done.
>> 
>> Finally, I'll agree that lazy consensus can be used inappropriately, I
>> just don't think I agree that it's happened yet.
> 
> +1 to all of that.

Same.

Jan
--

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dirkjan


Mime
View raw message