incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Futon.Next Proof of Concept
Date Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:14:53 GMT
Thanks Octavian. That's *totally* fine.

On 3 November 2012 16:44, Octavian Damiean <mainerror@gmail.com> wrote:

> Compiled artifact in this case means, compiled LESS files to CSS (minified
> or not), JavaScript (minified or not) and HTML. So no bytecode, it would
> still be readable (except minified JS and CSS are a bit hard to read bit
> still plaintext).
>
> Cheers,
> Octavian
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Also, Bob sed:
> >
> > If the choice is node as a build dependency versus checking in compiled
> > > artifacts, I choose node.
> >
> >
> > Perhaps someone can clarify for me what a compiled artefact is? We can't
> > ship compiled code. We can ship compressed or package code. But if we're
> > compiling code into bytecode or machine code, that is a complete no-no in
> > both our repos and our releases.
> >
> > --
> > NS
> >
>



-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message