Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DE1598E5 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 18:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13078 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2012 18:08:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 13051 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2012 18:08:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 13042 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2012 18:08:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:08:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nslater@tumbolia.org designates 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.180] (HELO mail-ie0-f180.google.com) (209.85.223.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:08:01 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id e10so7440180iej.11 for ; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:07:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tumbolia.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dR2Dws/U5dJgiPfaNNQ1gdX5FmTfJI1aPENre/h7m1A=; b=J7AYSdB6Ab7d/x2BGnchDLQ/AkYvdRgMQreIRK6Imm0SyLIVcDTuXz6Odk04Ori0Ta S/YkN5RC3RuN81n2QSu8v0j1k35oqlqeAQxmaC87UXqFK/G404vCxz7fNhn1JHfbBUjo cz7rih8noQplMovwroOWRvH8vOmJMcciCr/RI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=dR2Dws/U5dJgiPfaNNQ1gdX5FmTfJI1aPENre/h7m1A=; b=j6o7FOf1dXyacgmlMUaPOUDkr1GKP1+z/8WSdE8bs6EOstiQKaXgUThPWQygB5v3r1 JdbpC1wiQFXy217hMfHmpZ1wCIiVIhKnhco19T5+JQiuwol3ALjV1x2h1FVd/9K3YubF 4aOFRSOLjS72I9Mc2ZvZYJKeNBcj1elLpEnAmJ71wquojGEmLnFnxBFbDt+bHyRxqnbE X4iPwY/V3X66PhJNYHQuuv7TJboXiUhrI6j/bcRHGuWzgFC7e9aU4nODusQMTCJlZiLa blQKeeUEcAA2VT5V0isSVlkZKG+8z/SQZDuS1Y+24xImBYsX/ZgfLHeuffkES8zoc90T qDYA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.178.106 with SMTP id cx10mr4008512igc.24.1349633261131; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.63.19 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 11:07:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [178.250.115.206] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 19:07:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: deb versioned database dirs From: Noah Slater To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f5036c81b583a04cb7bfb9a X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm8Qciem79jpIlbczjc8W9IBH0GEQ5pdJZ3sAkGYsJOjwL0DWySqzX9rO1dD0UZKNSmBiVc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f5036c81b583a04cb7bfb9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Okay, cool. :) On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Randall Leeds wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Robert Newson wrote: > > > > It's currently the case, yes. We can read 0.10.0 onwards, I think. > > > > What I think we *can* promise is that we'll read 1.0.0 onwards for the > forseeable future. If that changes, then that upgrade is the one that will > need extra care and attention. > > I tend to agree. The common case should be compatibility. We can alert > and require intervention for some future version if and when that > becomes necessary. > > If we're okay with this approach, I'll update my packaging and publish > the work I've done for the rest who are interested in debian > packaging. Then I will update my PPA. > > -Randall > -- NS --e89a8f5036c81b583a04cb7bfb9a--